Michigan Primary: Sanders did better than his recorded vote indicates
Richard Charnin (with John Brakey)
March 11, 2016
Officially, Sanders had 590,386 votes (49.8%) and Clinton 570,948 (48.3%). This analysis indicates that Sanders did much better than his recorded vote, just as he did in Massachusetts. As in Boston, urban areas Wayne County (Detroit) and Oakland County apparently voted for Clinton.
Once again, we have multiple confirmation indicating fraud: Cumulative vote shares, preliminary exit poll, absentee vote anomalies and other anecdotal information.
Will we see the same fraud indicators in FL, OH, IL, MO and NC on March 15?
It should be conventional wisdom by now: in state elections, fraud abounds in heavily populated urban and suburban locations. Of course, the media never talks about it. They just report the recorded numbers as if there was not a fraud factor.
Sanders had 56% at the 600,000 Cumulative vote share mark and nearly 56% of 200,000 votes cast on AccuVote and Sequoia voting machines. He led 52.1-45.9% in the unadjusted exit poll.
Clinton had an astounding 75% of approximately 240,000 absentee votes. And she had 51.2% of 336,000 ES&S machine votes. Both of these numbers are highly suspect.
Clinton won Massachusetts by 1.4%, but hand counted precincts favored Sanders by 17%, and 68 Towns hand-counted 2.7% of votes cast.